Taste is a term literally employed to refer to one of the five
senses, the one that
provides gustatory discrimination and enjoyment. As a bodily
sense, taste is
inevitably linked with
pleasure or displeasure; that is to say, it is a sensory response that
tends to carry a positive or negative balance. This affective component
is one of the features of gustatory taste that lends itself to
employment as a metaphor of
aesthetic enjoyment, for the object of taste is not only
perceived but also liked or
disliked.
1- taste needs first-hand experience. this is known as knowledge by acquaintance. Just as one cannot decide that soup is well-seasoned without actually sipping
it, so one cannot conclude that music is lyrical and moving without hearing it.
2- though aesthetic taste is grounded in natural dispositions, it clearly requires cultivation.
Cultivation doesn't mean elitism. It means having access to the information.
3- taste is a kind of sensibility,
although some theorists such as Edmund Burke insisted on the role of understanding
in determining appreciation. In any case, taste soon became the chief term employed
to explain the perception of beauty.
All you have to do is surmise that appreciating a painting is a form of tasting it visually.
4- taste is inter-subjective: one has it, but in addition, one learns about it through exchange of information with others.
5- judgements of taste are about objects: the statement "X is beautiful" is not just a report that it pleases the speaker, but a debatable claim that
refers to qualities in X, that may be noticed and enjoyed by others.
Scottish
empiricist David Hume makes central use of the idea that taste in art
is developed in ways rather similar to taste for food or drink. To
advance his argument he tells an anecdote about two tasters of
wine who are ridiculed
because they can detect faint traces of metal and leather in a hogshead
of wine that
no one else can taste. But they are vindicated in the end, because when
the cask is
drained it is found to contain a key attached to a leather thong, and
the discerning
tasters are proved to have the most delicate taste.
Hume
unknowingly is advancing a realist position in aesthetics, THE FLAVOR
OF LEATHER IS IN THE JUICE. Sommeliers do this all the time. remind me
to talk about Triff's formula for wine tasting.
Hume talks about the body of sophisticated judges, whose opinions
converge over time in agreement what I've called BEST CONSENSUS.
Taste and aesthetic qualities:
These are qualities that can be noticed by anyone with normally
functioning senses who is paying sufficient attention. Aesthetic qualities are properties
that distinguish an object as worthy of appreciation or criticism, example: delicate, elegant,
powerful, profound, stiff, awkward, and so on are examples of aesthetic qualities.
They are not easily discerned by all perceivers but rather require the exercise of a
certain sensitivity that the tradition labels "taste."
1- aesthetic judgements diverge more than descriptions about non-aesthetic qualities. why? because
aesthetic properties depends upon the presence of non-aesthetic
properties.
2- aesthetic realism defends the
idea that aesthetic
qualities are actual properties of objects. Perhaps they are
‘supervenient’ properties
dependent upon non-aesthetic properties, such that objects with the very
same non-aesthetic properties must have the same aesthetic
properties.
3- taste may be considered
an ability to discern subtle qualities in objects: in food or drink the person with (fine)
taste can notice trace quantities of herbs or other flavors that lie beneath the
threshold of detectability for others.
No comments:
Post a Comment