Tuesday, June 25, 2019
phi 2604 exam #2 (open book) summer a 2020
1. In your own words explain Kant's Categorical Imperative (in your explanation bring forth both Kant's universality and reversibility points).
2. Bring an example from your life when you felt you were treated merely as a means to an end by somebody. What did you learn? (minimum 50 words)
3. The idea of RESPECT is fundamental in Kantian ethics. Explain is SELF-RESPECT connected to respecting others. Again, bring an example from your personal experience (minimum 50 words)
Saturday, June 15, 2019
Thursday, June 13, 2019
Monday, June 10, 2019
Sunday, June 9, 2019
Friday, June 7, 2019
homework 1 summer a 2020
2- as per values, which secondary value do you find more important? as per religious and spiritual values, do you find a lack of some of these values today? why do you think?
Thursday, June 6, 2019
Thursday, May 30, 2019
Thursday, May 23, 2019
as per our conversation (the sequel of divorce for the next generation)
1. theft shoots from 13 in intact married family to 22% with step-family and 18% with single-parent family. children of divorced parents are likely to commit more crimes.
2. school problems, increase from 20% intact married family to 40% in step-family homes and 52% in single-parent family homes. children from divorced families are more likely to be expelled or suspended.
3. fights spikes from 28% intact married family to 42% with step-family, 39% single-parent family. children of divorced parents are more violent.
4. alcohol consumption increases from 25% intact married family to 39% in step-family settings.
5. drug habits spike 10 intact married family to 18% in step-family households.
6. there's more suicide among children of divorced parents.
on the other hand, there's a different causation: 1. the decrease in married couples drives up the percentage of unmarried parents; 2. majority of single parents are likely to be female and black,
click here for more information,
Monday, May 20, 2019
Friday, May 17, 2019
Tuesday, May 14, 2019
Monday, April 22, 2019
Thursday, April 18, 2019
MLK's theology of social change
I have held many things in my hands, and I have lost them all; but whatever I have placed in God's hands, that I still possess.-- MartinLuther King
This post closes our discussion on the philosophy of religion.
Martin Luther King's religious and social journey demonstrates that faith is a viable source for human transformation.
KING'S MESSAGE IS THAT RELIGION IS A LIBERATING FORCE.
WHY?
1. religion provides an archetype of solidarity (the cohesive "glue" of society)
2. religion is a symbol for change & meaning (the future has to be better than the present),
3. religion represents our humanity, a VIP club whose admission has nothing to do with physical appearances (whether white, black, yellow, red) but as King put it: the content of our character.
King's influences:
King is influenced by many themes. Here I point to four:
1. The Black Church movement from early 20th century. Particularly the theology of George D. Kelsey, who taught King two courses in 1948. From Kelsey, King adopted the pulpit as a place both for drama, in the old-fashioned Baptist sense, and the articulation of philosophies that address specific problems of society.
2. The American theologian Reinhold Niebuhr, who preached that man's capacity for justice is what makes democracy possible.
3. H. David Thoreau's transcendentalism. The belief that there's inherent goodness of people and nature and that people are at their best when they become self-reliant and independent.
4. Mahatma Gandhi, whom King called "the guiding light of our nonviolent civil & social change." King adopted civil disobedience from Gandhi's own movement in India (built around the idea of ahimsa). Ahimsa (non harming) is one the five precepts of Buddhism.
On willing the good:
The will is a beast of burden. If God mounts it, it wishes and goes as God wills; if Satan mounts it, it wishes and goes as Satan wills.Analysis: King implies an Aristotelian view of morality, i.e., human nature is neutral to good or evil. One carries the responsibility to mold and avail oneself of the will to act morally.
The realism of MLK:
We are not makers of history. We are made by history.Analysis: Once again, the idea of how you evaluate the present. King takes the opposite course of voluntarism (we change things) with the Hindu idea of karma. Every action has a consequence, which will come to fruition in either this life (or a future life); thus, morally good acts have positive consequences, whereas bad acts will produce negative results. However, good -although it may seem the opposite- always wins.
God writes the Gospel not in the Bible alone, but also on trees, and in the flowers and clouds and stars.
Analysis: King points to the multifarious nature of God's commanding presence. We better understand reality by looking at everything containing God's presence.
We must develop the capacity to forgive. He who is devoid of the power to forgive is devoid of the power of love.
There is good and evil in the best of us.Analysis: Deep quotes in tune with our overall discussion. WE ARE ALL FALLIBLE.
On truth:
I've decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear.
Let no man to push you so low as to hate him.Analysis: Hate is toxic and it eats away our capacity to love. For our own good, we ought to delete hate of ourselves. The second quote is profound: Hate is deceiving, even addictive. King suggests that we're responsible for our own hate! Either as when hate feels "legitimate" as a narcissistic & vicious form of justice, or as dangerous self-pity.
On faith:
I have held many things in my hands, and I have lost them all; but whatever I have placed in God's hands, that I still possess.
Everything good in the world that is done is done by faith.Analysis: 1. Kings suggests that faith is inexhaustible because its source is inexhaustible. 2. This is what we've discussed before as meaning. The projection of humanity in the future. It's better to be hopeful than not.
